What is Ecological Footprint and Why is it Important?
The ecological footprint (EF) represents the area of land on earth that provides for resources consumed and that assimilates the waste produced by a given entity or region.
The Ecological Footprint is a measure of how much biologically productive land and water area is used by an individual, a city, a country, a region, or humanity to produce the resources it consumes and to absorb the waste it generates, using prevailing technology and resource management.
The ecological footprint thus measures human demand on nature, i.e., the quantity of nature it takes to support people or an economy. It includes the biologically productive area needed to provide for fruits and vegetables, fish, wood, fibres, absorption of carbon dioxide from fossil fuel use, and space for buildings and roads.
In short, it is a measure of human impact on Earth’s ecosystem.
The EF is beneficial because it provides a single value (equal to land area required) that reflects resource use patterns. The Ecological Footprint is most commonly expressed in units of global hectares.
The use of EF in combination with a social and economic impact assessment can provide a measure of sustainability. It can help find some of the “hidden” environmental costs of consumption that are not captured by techniques such as cost-benefit analysis and environmental impact. Using the ecological footprint, an assessment can be made of where the largest impact comes from.
Biocapacity (or biological capacity) is the capacity of ecosystems to produce useful biological materials and to absorb waste materials generated by humans. “Useful biological materials” are defined for each year as those used by the human economy that year. What is considered “useful” can change over time.
Like the Ecological Footprint, biocapacity is usually expressed in units of global hectares, and is calculated for all biologically productive land and sea area on the planet.
Biologically productive area is land and water (both marine and inland) area that supports significant photosynthetic activity and biomass accumulation that can be used by humans. Non-productive and marginal areas such as arid regions, open oceans, the cryosphere, and other low-productive surfaces are not included. Areas producing biomass that is not of use to humans are also not included.
In 2003 (the most recent year for which consistent data are available), the biosphere had 11.2 billion hectares of biologically productive area, corresponding to roughly one quarter of the planet’s surface.
The process of measuring both the Ecological Footprint and biocapacity of a business, nation, region, or the planet is often referred to as Ecological Footprint accounting.
In 2003, global Ecological Footprint accounts showed that humanity’s total Footprint exceeded the Earth’s biocapacity by approximately 25 per cent.
Ecological Footprint accounting is based on some fundamental assumptions:
• The majority of the resources people consume and the wastes they generate can be tracked.
• Most of these resource and waste flows can be measured in terms of the biologically productive area necessary to maintain these flows. Resource and waste flows that cannot be measured are excluded from the assessment, leading to a systematic underestimate of the true Ecological Footprint.
• By weighing each area in proportion to its bio-productivity, different types of areas can be converted into the common unit of global hectares, with world average bio-productivity.
• Human demand, expressed as the Ecological Footprint, can be directly compared to nature’s supply, biocapacity, when both are expressed in global hectares.
Area demanded can exceed area supplied if demand on an ecosystem exceeds that ecosystems regenerative capacity (e.g., humans can temporarily demand more biocapacity from forests, or fisheries, than those ecosystems have). This situation, where Ecological Footprint exceeds available biocapacity, is known as overshoot.
Because the Footprint is a historical account, many activities that systematically erode nature’s future regenerative capacity are not included in current and past Ecological Footprint accounts.
These activities include the release of materials for which the biosphere has no significant assimilation capacity (e.g. PCBs, dioxins, and other persistent pollutants) and processes that damage the biosphere’s future capacity (e.g. species extinction, salination resulting from cropland irrigation, soil erosion from tilling).
The consequences of these activities will be reflected in future Ecological Footprint accounts as a decrease in biocapacity.
However, Ecological Footprint accounting does not currently include risk assessment models that would allow a present accounting of these future damages.
A carbon footprint is the total amount of Greenhouse Gases – GHGs (especially carbon dioxide and methane) released into the atmosphere by different human activity.
Carbon footprints can be associated with an individual, an organization, a product or an event.
According to the World Health Organization (WHO), a carbon footprint is a measure of the impact people’s activities have on the amount of carbon dioxide (CO2) produced through the burning of fossil fuels and is expressed as a weight of CO2 emissions produced in tonnes.
The carbon footprint is seen as a subset of the ecological footprint, where carbon footprint deals with resource usage but focuses strictly on the greenhouse gases released due to burning of fossil fuels, while the latter compares the total resources people consume with the land and water area that is needed to replace those resources.
The release of Six Greenhouse gases as recognized by the Kyoto Protocol will be counted in the carbon footprint. The Six GHGs are –
Carbon dioxide (CO2)
Methane (CH4)
Nitrous Oxide (N2O)
Perfluorocarbon (PFCs)
Sulphur hexafluoride (SF6)
Carbon footprints are usually measured in equivalent tons of carbon dioxide – CO2e, during the period of a year.
CO2e is calculated by multiplying the emissions of each of the six greenhouse gases by its 100 year global warming potential (GWP).
On comparing various forms of energy generation Coal has the largest Carbon footprint among others followed by Oil, Natural Gas and Geothermal Energy.
Carbon footprints are of Two types –
Organizational – Emissions from all the activities across the organisation such as energy use, industrial processes and company vehicles.
Product – Emissions from the extraction of raw materials and manufacturing right through to its use and final reuse, recycling or disposal i.e. over the whole life of a product or service.
Effects of Increased Carbon Footprints
Large Scale resources are depleted with increased carbon emissions, from deforestation activity in a country to an increased use of air conditioners in our homes.
Carbon footprints have great effects on climate change. Emission of Greenhouse Gasses in the atmosphere leads to warming of the planet.
According to World Meteorological Organization (WMO) records, 2011-2020 was the warmest decade on record, in a persistent long-term climate change trend.
From 1990 to 2005, the emissions of carbon dioxide increased by 31%. By 2008, the emissions had contributed to a 35% increase in radiative warming, or a shift in Earth’s energy balance toward warming, over 1990 levels.
Steps to Lessen Carbon Footprints
The average carbon footprint globally is closer to 4 tons. It needs to drop under 2 tons by 2050 in order to avoid the chance of 2 degree celsius rise in the Global Temperature.
The actions by which we can help reduce the carbon footprints are –
It can be reduced through improving energy efficiency and changing lifestyles and purchasing habits, such as-
Avoiding the products with lots of packaging
Adopt 4 R’s – refuse, reduce, recycle, reuse
Switching one’s energy and transportation use can have an impact on primary carbon footprints.
Replacing regular light bulbs with compact fluorescent lamp – CFL
A ton of carbon dioxide is released when we for example travel 5000 miles in an airplane or drive 2,500 miles in a medium – sized car, hence
Avoid taking connecting flights
Take public transport or drive a more efficient vehicle.
Walk or use bicycles instead of using bikes, cars, etc.
Switching from coal to a less carbon-intensive energy source.
Planting more trees.